Hi
Mike Anderson was doing an OLTP benchmark on a computer with 48 physical
disks mapped to one logical device via device mapper.
He found that there was a slowdown on request_queue->lock in function
generic_unplug_device. The slowdown is caused by the fact that when some
code calls unplug on the device mapper, device mapper calls unplug on all
physical disks. These unplug calls take the lock, find that the queue is
already unplugged, release the lock and exit.
With the below patch, performance of the benchmark was increased by 18%
(the whole OLTP application, not just block layer microbenchmarks).
So I'm submitting this patch for upstream. I think the patch is correct,
because when more threads call simultaneously plug and unplug, it is
unspecified, if the queue is or isn't plugged (so the patch can't make
this worse). And the caller that plugged the queue should unplug it
anyway. (if it doesn't, there's 3ms timeout).
Mikulas
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.25/block/blk-core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25.orig/block/blk-core.c 2008-04-17 04:49:44.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.25/block/blk-core.c 2008-04-29 18:50:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -271,6 +271,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__generic_unplug_device);
**/
void generic_unplug_device(struct request_queue *q)
{
+ if (likely(!blk_queue_plugged(q)))
+ return;
+
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
__generic_unplug_device(q);
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
--Where were these unplug calls coming from? The block layer will generally only unplug when it is already unplugged, so if you are seeing so many unplug calls that the patch redues overhead by as much described, perhaps the callsite is buggy? -- Jens Axboe --
I do not have direct access the the benchmark setup, but here is the data I have received. The oprofile data was showing ll_rw_blk::generic_unplug_device() as a top routine at 13% of the samples. Annotation of the samples shows hits on spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock). Here are some sample call traces: Call trace #1 kernel: [<ffffffff80058c6c>] generic_unplug_device+0x5d/0xc6 kernel: [<ffffffff8820ea3e>] :dm_mod:dm_table_unplug_all+0x33/0x41 kernel: [<ffffffff8820cc85>] :dm_mod:dm_unplug_all+0x1d/0x28 kernel: [<ffffffff8005a78a>] blk_backing_dev_unplug+0x56/0x5b kernel: [<ffffffff80014cdc>] sync_buffer+0x36/0x3f kernel: [<ffffffff800629a4>] __wait_on_bit+0x40/0x6f kernel: [<ffffffff80014ca6>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x3f kernel: [<ffffffff80062a3f>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x78 kernel: [<ffffffff8009c474>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23 kernel: [<ffffffff88034c85>] :jbd:journal_commit_transaction+0x91f/0x1086 kernel: [<ffffffff8003d038>] lock_timer_base+0x1b/0x3c kernel: [<ffffffff8803840e>] :jbd:kjournald+0xc1/0x213 kernel: [<ffffffff8009c446>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e kernel: [<ffffffff8009c283>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61 kernel: [<ffffffff8803834d>] :jbd:kjournald+0x0/0x213 kernel: [<ffffffff8009c283>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61 kernel: [<ffffffff800321d5>] kthread+0xfe/0x132 kernel: [<ffffffff8005cfb1>] child_rip+0xa/0x11 kernel: [<ffffffff8009c283>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0x61 kernel: [<ffffffff800320d7>] kthread+0x0/0x132 kernel: [<ffffffff8005cfa7>] child_rip+0x0/0x11 Call trace #2 kernel: [<ffffffff80058c6c>] generic_unplug_device+0x5d/0xc6 kernel: [<ffffffff8820ea3e>] :dm_mod:dm_table_unplug_all+0x33/0x41 kernel: [<ffffffff8820cc85>] :dm_mod:dm_unplug_all+0x1d/0x28 kernel: [<ffffffff8005a78a>] blk_backing_dev_unplug+0x56/0x5b kernel: [<ffffffff80...
So it's basically dm calling into blk_unplug() all the time, which doesn't check if the queue is plugged. The reason why I didn't like the initial patch is that ->unplug_fn() really should not be called unless the queue IS plugged. So how about this instead: http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=c44993018887e82abd49023e92e8d8b... That's a lot more appropriate, imho. -- Jens Axboe --
This doesn't seem correct to me. The difference between blk_unplug and generic_unplug_device is that blk_unplug is called on every type of device and generic_unplug_device (pointed to by q->unplug_fn) is a method that is called on low-level disk devices. dm and md redefine q->unplug_fn to point to their own method. On dm and md, blk_unplug is called, but generic_unplug_device is not. So if you have this setup dm-linear(unplugged) -> disk(plugged) then, with your patch, a call to blk_unplug(dm-linear) will not unplug the disk. With my patch, a call to blk_unplug(dm-linear) will unplug the disk --- it calls q->unplug_fn that points to dm_unplug_all, that calls blk_unplug again on the disk and that calls generic_unplug_device on disk queue. Mikulas --
That is because the md/dm don't set the plugged flag which I think they should. So we fix that instead so that plugging works the same from the block core or from a driver instead of adding work-arounds in the block unplug handler. Adding a check for plugged in the plug handler is a hack, I don't see how you can argue against that. -- Jens Axboe --
When should dm/md set the plugged flag? It has several disks (or more
dm/md layers), some of them may be plugged, some not --- furthermore, the
disk queues are shared by other devices --- there may be more devices on
different partitions.
So the question: when do you want dm/md to set the plugged bit? Do you
I changed generic_unplug_device from:
spin_lock()
if (plugged bit is set) unplug...;
spin_unlock()
to:
if (plugged bit is set)
{
spin_lock()
if (plugged bit is set) unplug...;
spin_unlock()
}
--- I don't see anything wrong with it. At least, the change is so trivial
that we can be sure that it won't have negative effect on performance.
What you propose is complete rewrite of dm/md plugging mechanism to plug
the queue and merge requests at upper layer --- the questions are:
- what exactly you are proposing? (plugging at upper layer? lower layer?
both layers? don't plug and just somehow propagate the plugged bit?)
- why are you proposing that?
Note that for some dm targets it would be benefical to join the requests
at upper layer (dm-linear, raid1), for others (raid0, dm-snapshots) it
damages performance (you merge the requests before passing them to raid0
and you chop them again to smaller pieces in raid0).
--It will indeed get a lot more involved. Sigh. Well I'll apply your patch to generic_unplug_device(), it's at least a worth while optimization in the mean time. -- Jens Axboe --
Makes sense to me, ack. Alasdair -- agk@redhat.com --
unplug is called on any wait_on_buffer (and similar calls) __wait_on_buffer -> sync_buffer -> blk_run_address_space -> blk_run_backing_dev -> bdi->unplug_io_fn(bdi, page); (I'm not sure that this was the IBM's case, I'm just guessing - this is the most obvious example where unplug is called repeatedly) There is not any test that the queue is plugged and there shouldn't be. If you have this situation dm-linear(unplugged) -> physical-disk(plugged) then uplung should be called on dm-linear (that will call dm-unplug method dm_unplug_all and that will unplug the disk). If you add the test of plugged queue to the upper layer, you mess this situation with stacked drivers completely. The test for already plugged queue should be at the lowest physical device driver, not in upper layers. Mikulas --
Fair enough, I'll put the patch under closer scrutiny and queue it up. Thanks! -- Jens Axboe --
| Pardo | Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit 64b context switc... |
| Paul Jackson | Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() |
| Peter Zijlstra | Re: Btrfs v0.16 released |
git: | |
| Giuseppe Bilotta | Re: gitweb and remote branches |
| Miklos Vajna | [rfc] git submodules howto |
| JD Guzman | C# Git Implementation |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Steve B | SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Marius ROMAN | 1440x900 resolution problem |
| Tomasz Grobelny | [PATCH 0/5] [DCCP]: Queuing policies |
| Dushan Tcholich | Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 |
| John Heffner | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | Re: Could you make vconfig less stupid? |
