On Wed, 7 May 2008 08:59:53 +0200 Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:Not "must". The arch maintainer could ask you to merge it or you could ask the arch maintainer to merge it. It's some little one-line change like this one appeared to be, it's fair to assume the arch maintainer won't care much about it. View it as an i2c patch? --
| Linus Torvalds | Re: O_DIRECT question |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Dave Airlie | Re: [2.6.25-rc6] possible regression: X server dying |
| Florian Schmidt | blacklist kernel boot option |
git: | |
| Petr Baudis | repo.or.cz wishes? |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Matthieu Moy | [BUG] git-svn dcommit fails (connection closed unexpectedly) |
| Jakub Narebski | Git User's Survey 2007 partial summary |
| Ondřej Surý | openbgp not exporing ipv6 to routing tables |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Christophe Rioux | OpenBSD as host for VMWare Server |
| Bambero | two wan interfaces |
| Warner Losh | Re: SMP re-eetrancy in "bottom half" drivers |
| Martin Husemann | Re: Prototype kernel continuation-passing for NetBSD |
| Martin Husemann | Dynamic registry of ehternet frame types |
| der Mouse | Re: file id alignment |
