Hi Maciej, On Wed, 7 May 2008 01:40:27 +0100 (BST), Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:Minor corrections which would ideally belong to a separate patch (there's a whole lot more cleanups that could be done in that driver, BTW...) I don't think that the minor changes below are enough for you to claim copyright on that driver. Why do you double the space and the end of comments? Never seen that before, and I can't see the idea. I'm not sure how you intend to push these changes upstream. I would take a patch only touching drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sibyte.c in my i2c tree, however a patch also touching arch code, must be handled be the maintainer for that architecture or platform. -- Jean Delvare --
| Pardo | Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit 64b context switc... |
| Paul Jackson | Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() |
| Peter Zijlstra | Re: Btrfs v0.16 released |
git: | |
| Giuseppe Bilotta | Re: gitweb and remote branches |
| Miklos Vajna | [rfc] git submodules howto |
| JD Guzman | C# Git Implementation |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] fix parallel make problem |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Steve B | SSH brute force attacks no longer being caught by PF rule |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Marius ROMAN | 1440x900 resolution problem |
| Tomasz Grobelny | [PATCH 0/5] [DCCP]: Queuing policies |
| Dushan Tcholich | Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 |
| John Heffner | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | Re: Could you make vconfig less stupid? |
