On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 00:39 -0300, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
quoted text
> So comparing with the numbers you quoted from your experiments
> you will realize that the value you got with my patch is actually
> 10 times better, so your assumption about clocksource_hz2mult
> being more correct is not good.

If that's the case then we really need to correct
clocksource_hz2mult() .. Since that function is what we use to calculate
the mult in most cases.

Daniel

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/