login
Header Space

 
 

Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible.

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Cc: <balbir@...>, Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - 11:37 pm

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:43 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

I'd word it as

/*
 * "owner" points to a task that is regarded as the canonical
 * user/owner of this mm. All of the following must be true in
 * order for it to be changed:
 *
 * current == mm->owner
 * current->mm != mm
 * new_owner->mm == mm
 * new_owner->alloc_lock is held
 */

Paul
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue May 6, 1:40 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., Balbir Singh, (Tue May 6, 1:48 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue May 6, 2:03 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., Balbir Singh, (Tue May 6, 2:32 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue May 6, 2:18 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., Balbir Singh, (Tue May 6, 2:28 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Tue May 6, 2:43 am)
Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible., Paul Menage, (Tue May 6, 11:37 pm)
speck-geostationary