Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul Jackson
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - 6:58 pm

Paul M wrote:

An honorable goal.

Li Zefan - would you be interested in generating a patch
that fails -EINVAL for inputs outside the range of [-1 ... N]
for whatever small positive N the kernel recognizes?

This seems like a minor enough difference that I for one
don't have any problem with the current code, remapping
all negative inputs to -1, going in, and then a follow-on
patch changing that going in afterward.

Of course, if you or Seto-san prefer the current behaviour,
it would be easy to persuade me to agree.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file, Paul Jackson, (Tue May 6, 6:58 pm)