On Tue, 6 May 2008 17:26:22 -0700 "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com> wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> >  I definitely agree with the above observations of Paul M.  I suspect
> >  that the patch might be missing the lines needed to -remove- the
> >  FILE_SCHED_RELAX_DOMAIN_LEVEL cases from the old style
> >  cpuset_common_file_read and cpuset_common_file_write switches.
> 
> Yes, it is - but I didn't have a tree with the relevant bits in it to
> remove, as far as I could see.

This whole fiasco was caused by unexpected changes magically appearing in
mainline late in the merge window.  All very predictable.

quoted text
> >
> >   2) I didn't see any replies from Paul M in response to
> >     Andrews above request to "send us any needed fixup later
> >     in the week".
> >
> >         ==> Paul M or akpm - Is this fixup in the pipeline?
> 
> Not yet - I was waiting for 2.6.26-rc1-mm1 to come out. But I can send
> one against 2.6.26-rc1 directly if that helps.

I'm still crunching on backlog.  A fix against mainline would be great,
thanks.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/