login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
6
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
To: Justin Mattock <justinmattock@...>
Cc: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...>, Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 - 6:37 pm
On Tuesday, 22 of April 2008, Justin Mattock wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 06:10 +0000, Justin Mattock wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello; > > > > > with the latest git on a macbook the system can barely boot without > > > > > freezing, a work around for me at leat is either disable smp, or once > > > > > booted turn on glxgears,or compiling the kernel i.g. when using the > > > > > processors I'm not receiving a freeze, only when everything starts > > > > > lowering down. in dmesg I'm noticing BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for > > > > > CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell you're hw vendor) could this be the > > > > > reason for the system freezes?, > > > > > > > > I don't think so. On my machine there's no freezes with latest git and: > > > > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) > > > > BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell your hw vendor) > > > > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] enabled) > > > > BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! fixing up to 0x10. (tell your hw vendor) > > > > > > > > I've got exactly the same messages. > > > > > > Are you using a macbook aswell? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also I didnt have a camera handy on me > > > > > but the screen spit out = Bug spinlock lockup on CPU#0 > > > > > swapper/0. c17fa7c0 PID 0, comm: swapper not tainted. > > > > > > > > Can you try to write down more of those bug messages? > > > > > > Yeah, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont have a problem disabling smp, except when I cat /proc/cpuinfo I > > > > > don't see anything about my cores. > > > > > > > > What exactly you expect to see in /proc/cpuinfp while smp is disabled? > > > > > > under smp I see cpu cores. disabling smp I dont see cpu cores, under > > > cat /proc/cpuinfo. > > > > well.. SMP is kindof support for multiple processors, be it in one > > socket, or multiple sockets.. without SMP you will only be able to use 1 > > of your X cores. > > Yeah disabling smp is not a good idea on a macbook pro, performace is horrible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know this is a stupid question > > > > > but will it hurt the system if smp is disabled > > > > > for the macbook pro ati chipset.? > > > > > > > > No it won't. > > > > > > > > -Jacek > > > > > > > > > > Cool as long as the system Is o.k. disabling smp. > > It is.. but with the limitations outlined above. > > > What about x86: PAT > > > support is disabled. how do I enable this option? > > > regards; > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, well I guess this would be either a > regression or a bug. I think the best would be to have somebody else > with a macbook pro 15' ati chipset confirm this freezeing as well, > before going out and jumping the gun, and filing a bug report. > regards;
What's the current status of this issue? Rafael --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Justin Mattock
, (Tue Apr 22, 1:13 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Jacek Luczak
, (Tue Apr 22, 1:21 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Justin Mattock
, (Tue Apr 22, 2:10 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Kasper Sandberg
, (Tue Apr 22, 9:49 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Justin Mattock
, (Tue Apr 22, 10:36 am)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue May 6, 6:37 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Gabriel C
, (Tue May 6, 9:40 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed May 7, 5:47 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Justin Mattock
, (Wed May 7, 5:56 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Justin Mattock
, (Tue May 6, 11:08 pm)
Re: BIOS bug, APIC version if 0 for CPU#0
, Justin Mattock
, (Tue May 6, 6:46 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Jeff Garzik
Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch
git
:
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Arjan van de Ven
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
643 guests
online.
Syndicate