Kevin Winchester wrote:
quoted text
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> \
>>> Does that help?
>>
>> somewhat. If you still have your source tree, can you do
>>
>> make kernel/panic.s and send that file to me as well?
>> (offlist is fine)
>>
> 
> I didn't have the source tree around, but I created the tree+config, and 
> here is what I get (I believe it is not too big for the list):
> 

interesting; somehow gcc does NOT put stack-protector in place despite it being
told so with -fstack-protector-all.

# -fno-common -funit-at-a-time -fstack-protector -fstack-protector-all
# -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-omit-frame-pointer
# -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fverbose-asm -fstack-protector
# -fstack-protector


this is weird; something is adding ANOTHER -fstack-protector to the (effective) gcc
flags.. which might be overriding the -fstack-protector-all setting.

I wonder if this is a distro special ;(
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/