Hi,

Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> writes:

quoted text
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:23:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, 5 May 2008, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> > 
>> > here is a bootmem allocator replacement that uses one bitmap for all
>> > available pages and works with a model of contiguous memory blocks
>> > that reside on nodes instead of nodes only as the current allocator
>> > does.
>> 
>> Won't this have problems with huge non-contiguous areas?
>> 
>> Some setups have traditionally had node memory separated in physical space 
>> by the high bits of the memory address, and using a single bitmap for such 
>> things would potentially be basically impossible - even with a single bit 
>> per page, the "span" of possible pages is potentially just too high, even 
>> if the nodes themselves don't have tons of memory, because the memory is 
>> just very spread out - and allocating the initial bitmap may not work 
>> reliably.
>> 
>> Now, admittedly I don't know if we even support that kind of thing or if 
>> people really do things that way any more, so maybe it's not an issue.
>
> SGI sn2 architecture does.  Each DIMM bank is allocated a 16GB range
> of physical addresses.  There are up to four banks per node.  The node
> number is stuck into higher portions of the address, giving a gap between
> nodes of 256GB.  With a potential of 1024 nodes, you would have a very
> large array.
>
> Additionally on our upcoming UV systems, there will potentially be a
> hole between the bulk of memory and a small amount addressable at the
> high end of the address range (slightly short of 16TB) with the typical
> gap being on the order of 15TB.

Okay, that defeats the single-bitmap approach completely.

Thanks for clarifying.

	Hannes
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/