Hi Ingo,

On Tue, 6 May 2008 02:17:52 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
quoted text
>
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>=20
> > This was discovered in linux-next and a patch posted on March 28 ...
>=20
> hm, i do searches on lkml before posting patches but i cannot do=20
> searches on _every_ mailing list where patches might show up. There's=20
> just 30 hours in a day ;-)

They were both posted on lkml ... and I do appreciate your efforts.

quoted text
> perhaps linux-next should propagate all add-on fix patches it is=20
> carrying against subsystem trees if they are still relevant to -git,=20
> once the subsystem tree goes to -git, and re-post them to lkml in that=20
> case, to avoid duplicative work? Once it's on lkml i think most=20
> subsystem maintainers will find any missing patches.

See above and what you quoted below.

quoted text
> > I (and I assume Andrew) have been carrying them since then but noone=20
> > took them up.  I guess (as Andrew pointed out to me) I should have=20
> > pushed them.
>=20
> yeah.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/