On Sun, 04 May 2008 03:08:14 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:I worry a bit about all the conversion between page-counts and byte-counts in this code. For example, what happens if a process sits there increasing its rss with sbrk(4095) or sbrk(4097) or all sorts of other scenarios? Do we get in a situation in which the accounting is systematically wrong? Worse, do we risk getting into that situation in the future, as unrelated changes are made to the surrounding code? IOW, have we chosen the best, most maintainable representation for these things? --
| Yu Zhao | [PATCH 2/16 v6] PCI: define PCI resource names in an 'enum' |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
| Laurent Riffard | Re: 2.6.23-mm1: BUG in reiserfs_delete_xattrs |
| Ben Crowhurst | Kernel Development & Objective-C |
git: | |
| Kyle Rose | [OT] Re: C++ *for Git* |
| cte | linking libgit.a in C++ projects |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: CRLF problems with Git on Win32 |
| Pierre Habouzit | Re: [PATCH] bundle, fast-import: detect write failure |
| Thor Lancelot Simon | Re: sysctl knob to let sugid processes dump core (pr 15994) |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: Patches for EST and SMP |
| Bill Studenmund | Re: @booted_kernel magic symlink? |
| Adam Hamsik | Re: Thread benchmarks, round 2 |
| Chris | OpenBSD 4.4 installation error: write failed; file system full |
| Samuel Moñux | Cyrus IMAP performance problems [Long] |
| Steve B | Intel Atom and D945GCLF2 |
| James Hartley | scp batch mode? |
