login
Header Space

 
 

Re: VFS + path walktrough

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <miklos@...>
Cc: <viro@...>, <miklos@...>, <weigelt@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, May 5, 2008 - 2:31 pm

> > > >  Take a look at 9P walk - it does *not* give

And actually even that *could* be a win, if the network latency is
large.  Because by doing the lookup first, the stats can be performed
in parallel.  So a path with an arbitrary number of components could
be resolved in just 2 RTTs.

Miklos
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
VFS + path walktrough, Enrico Weigelt, (Mon May 5, 8:40 am)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Enrico Weigelt, (Mon May 5, 9:06 am)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Al Viro, (Mon May 5, 9:13 am)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Enrico Weigelt, (Mon May 5, 9:43 am)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Al Viro, (Mon May 5, 11:35 am)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon May 5, 12:43 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Al Viro, (Mon May 5, 1:14 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon May 5, 1:33 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Al Viro, (Mon May 5, 1:40 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Enrico Weigelt, (Mon May 5, 2:23 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Al Viro, (Mon May 5, 2:34 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Enrico Weigelt, (Mon May 5, 3:02 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Al Viro, (Mon May 5, 3:09 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon May 5, 2:03 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Enrico Weigelt, (Mon May 5, 2:50 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon May 5, 2:31 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Trond Myklebust, (Mon May 5, 4:16 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon May 5, 4:35 pm)
Re: VFS + path walktrough, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon May 5, 1:03 pm)
speck-geostationary