login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
5
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Yinghai Lu
Subject:
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
Date: Monday, May 5, 2008 - 10:42 am
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Pallipadi, Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:
quoted text
> > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Frans Pop [mailto:elendil@planet.nl] > > >Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 9:55 AM > >To: Yinghai Lu > >Cc: Barnes, Jesse; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; > >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ingo Molnar; Packard, Keith > >Subject: Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes? > > > > >On Sunday 04 May 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> can you boot with pat=off and send out /proc/mtrr? > > > >Hmmm. Is 'pat=off' supposed to do anything? > > > > The option for this is actually "nopat". >
or the PAT has something wrong with WB in MTRR? YH --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Fri May 2, 12:22 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 2, 12:37 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri May 2, 1:40 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 2, 2:55 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri May 2, 3:07 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Sun May 4, 12:10 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun May 4, 2:04 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sun May 4, 1:23 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 8:57 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 9:55 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Mon May 5, 10:00 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 10:32 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Yinghai Lu
, (Mon May 5, 10:42 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 10:45 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Mon May 5, 10:59 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 11:56 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 11:59 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 12:04 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Tue May 6, 3:42 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed May 7, 12:02 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Hugh Dickins
, (Wed May 7, 12:18 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Wed May 7, 3:36 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Wed May 7, 4:23 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri May 9, 3:08 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Fri May 9, 1:05 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Fri May 9, 1:09 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Hugh Dickins
, (Fri May 9, 1:48 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Dave Airlie
, (Fri May 9, 3:11 pm)
RE: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 9, 3:20 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Keith Packard
, (Fri May 9, 10:45 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Dave Airlie
, (Fri May 9, 11:19 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Keith Packard
, (Fri May 9, 11:29 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Sun May 25, 8:08 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc
, Frans Pop
, (Fri Jun 13, 9:42 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 20/36] Driver core: Call device_pm_add() after bus_add_device() in device_a...
Oleg Nesterov
Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children.
Pekka Enberg
Re: [patch 2/9] lguest: the guest code
Alan Cox
Re: [2.6.27-rc4] compilation warnings and section mismatches
surya.prabhakar
[TEST RESULT]massive_intr.c -- cfs/vanilla/sd-0.40
git
:
Stephen R. van den Berg
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
Christian Stimming
git-gui: Fix broken revert confirmation.
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-svnimport
Anuj Gakhar
Git Architecture Question
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix approxidate("never") to always return 0
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
v2 [PATCH 1/4] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Nick Piggin
Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Ingo Molnar
Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k_htc: Allocate URBs properly
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] dma: use new dmabounce_sync_for_xxx() for dma_sync_single_xxx()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Cavium: Remove unused watchdog code.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (8976): af9015: Add USB ID for AVerMedia A309
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5670/1: bcmring: add default configuration for bcmring arch
openbsd-misc
:
Christophe Rioux
Implementation example of snmp
Ryan McBride
Re: Packets Per Second Limit?
Nick Holland
Re: booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom
Bryan Irvine
Re: OpenBSD 4.7 Released, May 19 2010
Jacob Yocom-Piatt
Re: Same shit all over again
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate