On Mon, 5 May 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
quoted text
>
> You should review my tree, it is several steps closer to mainline that
> the -rt version your working on. I did a lot of patch break-ups
> (required for bisection, and makes for a cleaner tree) and re-arranging
> patches.

I may take a look at your tree. But as for the rt version I'm working on,
is not the same as the one you started with. I did a lot of merging, I
also have the new ftrace code in there. I also moved patches around to
what we will be pushing to mainline.

quoted text
>
> Bisection is also required for mainline integration ..

Bisection is required for each element, we don't need it for the entire
tree (atm). If we waste our time making the entire tree fully bisectable,
then it will be a lot of work to maintain that bisectability when we
rewrite entire sections.

I am making it boot with certain parts intergrated. But my goal is not to
have every single patch compile and boot. We'll worry about that when we
need to push a part of the code in. But reality, what is there now, I can
guarantee will not be the code that is pushed when it is ready.

-- Steve

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/