login
Header Space

 
 

Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
Cc: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@...>, Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...>, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...>, <linux-raid@...>
Date: Monday, May 5, 2008 - 3:24 am

On Sunday May 4, jens.axboe@oracle.com wrote:
...

I suspect that will just cause more problems, as the 'q' for an md
device never gets ->queue_lock initialised.
I suspect the correct thing to do is set
	q->queue_lock = &conf->device_lock;

at some stage, probably immediately after device_lock is initialised
in 'run'.

I was discussing this with Dan Williams starting
  http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=120951839903995&w=4
though we don't have an agreed patch yet.

I'm wondering why you mention the issues of stacked devices though.  I
don't see how it applies.  Could you explain?

Thanks,
NeilBrown
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1, Neil Brown, (Mon May 5, 3:24 am)
Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1, Jens Axboe, (Mon May 5, 3:02 pm)
Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu May 8, 2:39 pm)
Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1, Dan Williams, (Thu May 8, 2:46 pm)
Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1, Dan Williams, (Thu May 8, 7:18 pm)
Re: WARNING in 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1, Dan Williams, (Mon May 5, 2:03 pm)
speck-geostationary