On Mon, 5 May 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:I don't use modules much, so many of my kernels tend to have modules off entirely. However, the Intel wireless drivers used to not work when built-in (fixed now, but I still had a legacy config), so my laptop had modules enabled, and MODVERSIONS set. And I don't build initrd's etc crap, very much on purpose. I want to replace the kernel, nothing else, so my /etc/grub.conf file just replaces the distro kernel with my own, and keeps everything else untouched. Wouldn't help one whit, and is against my rules anyway. See above. I want my own kernel, no other changes. That means that I run the distro initrd, which has its modules for bringing stuff up with distro kernels. And quite frankly, when I finally figured out what was going on, I was like *WHAT THE HELL*. That kernel/module.c code was absolute and utter crap in accepting modules that neither matched the kernel version signature (because it had CONFIG_MODVERSIONS) *nor* the actual versioned symbols (because the distro modules had been built without CONFIG_MODVERSIONS). So no, I'm not at all interested in blowing away old modules. I'm interested in having a module loader that isn't complete and utter crap and bypasses all the sanity checks that it has. Which is what that changeset basically does. People can still set CONFIG_MODULE_LOAD_FORCE, but quite frankly, I suspect that anybody who does that is just insane and/or works with proprietary and broken modules. So it's off by default, and hopefully no distro will ever set it. Linus --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ben Greear | Re: MACVLANs really best solution? How about a bridge with multiple bridge virtual... |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 |
