login
Header Space

 
 

Re: atl1 64-bit => 32-bit DMA borkage (reproducible, bisected)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...>
Cc: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...>, Chris Snook <csnook@...>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, <torvalds@...>
Date: Sunday, May 4, 2008 - 8:31 pm

On Mon, 5 May 2008 01:15:07 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:


Agreed.


Came from the vendor that way.


We had multiple reports of users who encountered repeated memory
corruption when transferring large files while running with a 64-bit DMA
mask.  Chris Snook noticed the upper 32 bits of the descriptor address
register are shared among five other registers, each containing the low
bits for one of five descriptors.  All the descriptors, therefore, have
to live within the same 4GB address space.

I'll keep poking at it as time permits through the week, but I probably
won't be able to devote a whole lot of time to it until next weekend.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 10, 11:33 pm)
BUG at __dentry_open [Was: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2], Jiri Slaby, (Mon Apr 14, 4:07 am)
2.6.25-rc8-mm2, , (Sat Apr 12, 5:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: IP: [&lt;ffffffff802868f9&gt;] __kmalloc..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 1:53 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: IP: [&lt;ffffffff802868f9&gt;] __kmalloc..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 1:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: FIX kmalloc-2048 (was Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 4:05 pm)
atl1 64-bit =&gt; 32-bit DMA borkage (reproducible, bisected), Alexey Dobriyan, (Sat Apr 19, 10:45 am)
Re: atl1 64-bit => 32-bit DMA borkage (reproducible, bisected), Jay Cliburn, (Sun May 4, 8:31 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: IP: [&lt;ffffffff802868f9&gt;] __kmalloc..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 2:00 pm)
[mm patch] select ATA_SFF, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Apr 12, 8:51 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 5:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 6:23 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 11, 6:34 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 6:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 7:17 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 9:17 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 11, 10:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Sun Apr 13, 11:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Apr 11, 9:40 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Andrew Morton, (Sat Apr 12, 12:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Sat Apr 12, 2:43 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Michael Schmitz, (Sun Apr 13, 3:45 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sun Apr 13, 4:11 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, , (Sat Apr 12, 1:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Andrew Morton, (Sat Apr 12, 2:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: Observed problems: Not a detailed bug re..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 15, 4:12 pm)
speck-geostationary