On Sat, 03 May 2008 10:46:39 +0200 Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.d=
e> wrote:
quoted text
>
> Of course some committers have more than one tree in -next.  So if=20
> Andrew wants to know the actual tree, the laziest method which I know of =
is
quoted text
> $ gitk <commit_id>
>=20
> Among else, gitk shows which branches contain the commit.  (How to do=20
> this without X GUI?)

Unfortunately, this will not work either as I do not export to the public
tree the heads of each of the branches that I merge.  It does work in my
tree until I do the next update.

However, if you look at the closest following merge that is committed by
me, that will tell you which branch the commit was on.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/