login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
4
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Yinghai Lu
Subject:
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
Date: Sunday, May 4, 2008 - 1:23 pm
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> wrote:
quoted text
> On Friday 02 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > This is just a transient issue during VT switch or server exit though, > > right? X functionality isn't affected, and your VTs work fine? > > Transient only. I've just tested again and this time the band > was visible on top of the text on VT1 for about 2 seconds. Then it > disappeared. > The artifacts also appear when I log out from KDE (i.e. without exiting the > server), and I also get the messages when logging out and logging in again. > > I do not see any performance issues, but I've only used this kernel for a > very short time. > > > > If so, it might not be a PAT issue but just a different memory layout or > > something (and therefore it would really just be a cosmetic bug in the X > > driver). > > The artifacts may not be a PAT issue directly, but it is a clear regression > for me as I currently have a nice clean screen when X shuts down. I'm also > 100% sure that it is caused by enabling PAT. A kernel with same config and > only PAT disabled does not show the artifacts. > > Would you like me to file a bug against X for these artifacts? > If so, against what component? The i810 driver or the server? > > > On Saturday 03 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > I don't see these error messages on my 965 here. May be I have different > > > x version. > > > Hm, yeah that could be. strace would tell us. > > Would you like me to do an strace? > > Attached my Xorg log for basic info (versions are current Debian unstable) > and the config I used. > > Also attached a dmesg that shows the messages. As you can see there are some > repeats. > - first 22 "expected mapping type" when X is started > - second 22 "expected mapping type" when logging in > - 9 "freeing invalid memtype" when logging out > - 22 "expected mapping type" when logging in again > - 9 "freeing invalid memtype" when logging out again > - last series "expected mapping type" when restarting X server > > > > On Saturday 03 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > More recent versions of X will use sysfs rather than /dev/mem (though > > we're still using the mprotect hack there to give us UC-), so yeah this > > warning should already be gone in more recent builds. > > On Friday 02 May 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > ... and should not cause any side-effects other than little annoyance. > > > On Friday 02 May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > I really think PAT should be on by default; if you're running into real > > functional or performance problems we'd better get them fixed rather than > > disabling PAT... > > I must say that I'm fairly disappointed by your (plural) attitude to these > regressions, especially given that you both seem to feel it is important > that people will actually use PAT. > > I would say that 40+ messages each time I start X is more than "a little > annoyance", especially if you run logcheck (as I do). > > I also think you both seriously underestimate how it will impact enabling > PAT, especially by distributions. Although the errors and the artifacts may > be minor from a technical point of view, they are the sort of issues that > users file bug reports about. Loads of them! > So I expect distros will be extremely reluctant to enable PAT when they know > they can expect this. The fact that the messages will go away at some point > in the future is absolutely not relevant. > > Add to that the current warning in the Kconfig help: > Say N here if you see bootup problems (boot crash, boot hang, > spontaneous reboots) or a non-working video driver. > > Do you really think that distros can afford the risk of such issues in their > generic kernel images even if it would only affect a small minority of > their user base? If this warning is realistic then IMHO X86_PAT should > default to N and be marked "experimental". > > You can be sure that I at least will not be enabling X86_PAT in the near > future because of these two issues. And given the nature of this option I'm > quite likely to completely forget about it afterwards... > > > That said, I'll be happy to help trace and get these issues fixed.
can you boot with pat=off and send out /proc/mtrr? YH --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Fri May 2, 12:22 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 2, 12:37 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri May 2, 1:40 pm)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 2, 2:55 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri May 2, 3:07 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Sun May 4, 12:10 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun May 4, 2:04 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Yinghai Lu
, (Sun May 4, 1:23 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 8:57 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 9:55 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Mon May 5, 10:00 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 10:32 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Yinghai Lu
, (Mon May 5, 10:42 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 10:45 am)
RE: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Mon May 5, 10:59 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 11:56 am)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Mon May 5, 11:59 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc
, Jesse Barnes
, (Mon May 5, 12:04 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Tue May 6, 3:42 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed May 7, 12:02 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Hugh Dickins
, (Wed May 7, 12:18 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Wed May 7, 3:36 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Wed May 7, 4:23 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri May 9, 3:08 am)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Fri May 9, 1:05 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Venki Pallipadi
, (Fri May 9, 1:09 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Hugh Dickins
, (Fri May 9, 1:48 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Dave Airlie
, (Fri May 9, 3:11 pm)
RE: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Pallipadi, Venkatesh
, (Fri May 9, 3:20 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Keith Packard
, (Fri May 9, 10:45 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Dave Airlie
, (Fri May 9, 11:19 pm)
Re: [git head] X86_PAT & mprotect
, Keith Packard
, (Fri May 9, 11:29 pm)
Re: [git head] Should X86_PAT really default to yes?
, Frans Pop
, (Sun May 25, 8:08 am)
Re: fb layer & ioremap_wc
, Frans Pop
, (Fri Jun 13, 9:42 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Matthew Garrett
Re: [PATCH] Enable speedstep for sonoma processors.
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: Add timberdale video-in driver
Peter Zijlstra
[PATCH 23/30] netvm: skb processing
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 21/28] cgroupfs: create /sys/fs/cgroup to mount cgroupfs on
git
:
Jan Hudec
Re: GIT push to sftp (feature request)
Steffen Prohaska
[PATCH 0/4] core.ignorecase
Johannes Schindelin
Re: Git checkout preserve timestamp?
Linus Torvalds
[PATCH 1/7] Make unpack_trees_options bit flags actual bitfields
Johan Herland
Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2010, #01; Wed, 13)
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH 1/3] f_phonet: dev_kfree_skb instead of dev_kfree_skb_any in TX callback
Richard Cochran
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ptp: Added a clock that uses the eTSEC found on the MPC85xx.
Jan Engelhardt
Re: [PATCH] Fix netfilter xt_time's time_mt()'s use of do_div()
Herbert Xu
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus
Jeff Kirsher
Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000e: don't inadvertently re-set INTX_DISABLE
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ALSA: hda - Enable beep on Realtek codecs with PCI SSID override
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Use path_put() in a few places instead of {mnt,d}put()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
mv643xx_eth: use sw csum for big packets
Linux Kernel Mailing List
arm: fix HAVE_CLK merge goof
Linux Kernel Mailing List
arm: convert pcm037 platform to use smsc911x
freebsd-current
:
David Wolfskill
"interrupt storm..."; seems associated with an0 NIC
Andriy Gapon
Re: letting glabel recognise a media change
Garrett Cooper
Re: Only display ACPI bootmenu key if ACPI is present
Pyun YongHyeon
CFT: msk(4) Rx checksum offloading support
FreeBSD Tinderbox
[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate