> On that note, I'd really like to see better binary availability of cross
> compilers. While it's improved over the last few years mostly due to the
> crossgcc stuff it's still a pain. Ideally, they would be available through
> the distribution package manager even but failing that some dedicated place
> on kernel.org with x86->lots and some of the more widely used other
> combinations would quite definitely be good. Perhaps not really directly
> relevant to this thread as such, but still good.
>
> Andrew maintain{s,ed} a number of them at
>
>
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/
>
> But as you see, most of the stuff there is really old again...