On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Stefan Richter
<stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
quoted text
>  Another reason which I read here and there and don't know how real the
> issue is:  2.6's minimum possible footprint is said to be unable to compete
> with 2.4 for really resource restricted applications.
>
>  Could it actually be that 2.4 outnumbers 2.6 in embedded installations?

Possibly.  However many embedded applications have real time
constraints so are using 2.6 these days.  Both vanilla and -rt patched
2.6 beat the pants off 2.4 in this area.

Lee
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/