On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 01:25:32PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted text > On Fri, 30 May 2008 17:33:54 -0700
> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > This looks like the meatiest patch, with lots of support for new
> > hardware. Gotta love the StudlyCaps...
>
> > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> > + * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> > + * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> > + * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> > + * copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sub license,
> > + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to
> > + * whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the
> > + * following conditions:
>
> Do we think the above is GPL compatible, do VIA think so, do VIA care to
> say in writing they consider it is if there are questions ?
As Via states in this patch later on:
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL and additional rights");
Yes, I think it is fair to say it is GPL compatible. Isn't this just a
variant of the BSD license?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: via agp patches , Greg KH , (Sat May 31, 10:43 am)