Re: OOM policy, overcommit control, and soft limits

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan Cox <alan@...>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <aj504@...>, Chris Frey <cdfrey@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, May 31, 2008 - 12:45 pm

Alan Cox wrote:
Thanks for the education.  I shall read up on the other numbers in 
/proc/meminfo as well.

In that case I was overly pessimistic.  I was only committed around the 
512M mark.  It jumps up to 750M if I open Amarok and Firefox though.  At 
times I've run more - I would guess I can contrive combinations which go 
above 1000M.


I've not had an OOM event on this machine.  I have had runaway 
development-related loads, causing thrashing (hitting swap) out of 
control, but I can't really comment.  I don't remember what caused it 
exactly.  Plus I'm swapping to a Flash drive; a Flash specific IO 
scheduler might have coped better (than noop) and made it easier to recover.

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: OOM policy, overcommit control, and soft limits, Alan Jenkins, (Sat May 31, 8:48 am)
Re: OOM policy, overcommit control, and soft limits, Alan Cox, (Sat May 31, 11:23 am)
Re: OOM policy, overcommit control, and soft limits, Alan Jenkins, (Sat May 31, 12:45 pm)