On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 May 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > versions that do identify themselves as "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686.PAE", and > > these ones didn't, (they're all in the "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686" form) so > > this is a kernel without PAE. > > Hmm. Every single one is that one kernel version or 2.6.25.3-18.fc9.i686, > and with that many reports I'd have expected it from other kernels too. > What was the previous popular fc9 kernel (I assume it was 2.6.25-based > too?), and what changed? -14 is the version that we released F9 with, which explains its popularity. -18 was the first update we pushed out within the first few days.. The earlier f9 builds were only beaten on by people testing our development tree, which is nowhere near as many as what jump on a proper release. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Tantilov, Emil S | WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:417 udp_lib_unhash |
