> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:54:06AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 03:12:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 01:22:47PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:58:30PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:59:40AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > > > Workload is build all arm defconfigs and all powerpc defconfigs and
> > > > > > something else in parallel from one source tree using O= and with
> > > > > > empty .ccache on ext2/noatime partition.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PREEMPT_RCU was again in use to do final check of Jens's patch (see URL)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kernel is afa26be86b65a7183ceac29bdf1f51d6fc6932f0 + CFQ fixlet
> > > > > >
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120946003120291&w=2 .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oops, disassembly and .config (DEBUG_INFO was turned off) below.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should we add PREEMPT_RCU to oops reports, BTW?
> > > > >
> > > > > Given that you see it with PREEMPT_RCU, but not classic RCU, that would
> > > > > make sense...
> > > > >
> > > > > I presume that this version of the kernel has the fixes from this thread
> > > > > applied?
> > > > >
> > > > >
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/19/85
> > > >
> > > > I recall two fixes from this thread: list.h one and text_poke() one. And
> > > > they were applied before 2.6.26-rc1. Were there anything else?
> > >
> > > Those are the two I am aware of.
> >
> > Triggered second time with 2.6.24-rc4.
> >
> > FWIW, workload was LTP in infinite loop + parallel compiling on 170 configs
> > with make O=../ on ext2
> > Core 2 Duo, 4G RAM, PREEMPT/PREEMPT_RCU, HZ=1000
>
> Thank you for the info!
>
> So you have 170 concurrent "make O=../" builds running, with them all
> putting their .o files in a common directory?
