Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to security ops

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Friday, May 30, 2008 - 6:37 am

Hello.

Miklos Szeredi wrote:

Patching these 15 patches fails. I think this is because the 8 patches are missing.
Can I see the 8 patches?

  2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
  Apply anyway? [n]
  5 out of 5 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej
  1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/filemap.c.rej
  2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  11 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej
  2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/namei.c.rej
  2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/security.h.rej
  1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file security/selinux/hooks.c.rej

Regards.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/15] security: pass path instead of inode to ..., Tetsuo Handa, (Fri May 30, 6:37 am)