Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 8:30 pm

On Thu, 29 May 2008 21:22:11 -0500 Paul Jackson wrote:



Uh.. We strongly want non-static functions to be documented via kernel-doc.
For static functions, it's up to the maintainer/developer whether to do that
or not.  But if the functions already have kernel-doc, there's no strong
reason to remove it.  And these look good currently, so I see no
good reason to change them.



---
~Randy
"He closes his eyes and drops the goggles.  You can't get hurt
by looking at a bitmap.  Or can you?"
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function up ..., Randy Dunlap, (Thu May 29, 8:30 pm)