Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask() | KernelTrap

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask()

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Miao Xie <miaox@...>

To: Paul Jackson <pj@...>

Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <menage@...>

Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_cpumask() and update_nodemask()

Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 10:16 pm

on 2008-5-30 9:53 Paul Jackson wrote:
quoted text> Miao wrote:
>> I think that it is unnecessary to change cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked()'s comment
>> because it isn't a static function, it is a extern function
> 
> Yes, you are correct.  My mistake.  Sorry.
> 

I check kernel/cpuset.c and find many static functions with "/**" comment.
So I want to remove the special commenting convention for them.

--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function update_c..., Miao Xie, (Thu May 29, 3:07 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Thu May 29, 4:16 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Miao Xie, (Thu May 29, 9:51 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Thu May 29, 9:53 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Miao Xie, (Thu May 29, 10:16 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Thu May 29, 10:22 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Randy Dunlap, (Thu May 29, 11:30 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Thu May 29, 11:57 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Randy Dunlap, (Fri May 30, 12:27 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Fri May 30, 2:25 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Randy Dunlap, (Fri May 30, 11:39 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Fri May 30, 12:07 pm)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Randy Dunlap, (Fri May 30, 11:32 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Alan Cox, (Fri May 30, 5:46 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Fri May 30, 11:22 am)

Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] cpusets: restructure the function upda..., Paul Jackson, (Fri May 30, 1:24 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
david	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Andrew Morton	Re: PROBLEM: high load average when idle
Karl Meyer	PROBLEM: 2.6.23-rc "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out"
git:

linux-netdev:
Evgeniy Polyakov	Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 28/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 3 (client side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 4 users and 781 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate