On Thu, 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:

quoted text
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:48:39PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > >       USB: EHCI: fix performance regression
> > 
> > That's not a regresssion at all!  Plus, this patch shouldn't
> > have included the timeout change.  The timeout change is why
> > I didn't ACK this patch...
> 
> Well, I was misinformed by Alan Stern about this then, sorry for missing
> that you didn't ack this one (you acked the other patches in this series
> though.)

The notion that this was a regression came about by mistake.  It was 
stated that 2.6.24 worked better than 2.6.25; apparently that remark 
was wrong.

quoted text
> Alan, care to make up a patch to fix this?  Or should I just revert it
> in the tree as-is?

Given that the issues are not yet resolved among the developers, I 
think reverting the patch for now is the best course.

Alan Stern

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/