Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Krzysztof Halasa
Date: Saturday, May 3, 2008 - 4:37 pm

Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> writes:


Not sure what do you mean, it currently seem to "depend" on X86_VISWS:

config FB_SGIVW
        tristate "SGI Visual Workstation framebuffer support"
        depends on FB && X86_VISWS
        select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
        select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
        select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT


(Obviously it assumes both TULIP and E1000E required MII which is not
exactly the case)

But it makes a perfect sense, I can have modular drivers for (few)
hardware devices (just in case I want to rmmod etc) but most of the
kernel may be not modular. It would be nice if the Kconfig ask me if
I want to "select" the dependency Y or M, even if there is only one
way to make "select" dependencies happy (not counting "Y vs "M").
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] input: JOYSTICK_XPAD build fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 30, 1:03 pm)
Re: [patch] input: JOYSTICK_XPAD build fix, Dmitry Torokhov, (Wed Apr 30, 2:02 pm)
Re: [patch] input: JOYSTICK_XPAD build fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 30, 2:13 pm)
Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Apr 30, 4:01 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 30, 6:17 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Apr 30, 6:37 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 30, 7:06 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Apr 30, 7:12 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 30, 7:52 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 1, 4:59 am)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Sat May 3, 12:14 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Sat May 3, 12:17 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 1:24 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Sat May 3, 2:03 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat May 3, 2:17 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 2:24 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Sam Ravnborg, (Sat May 3, 2:38 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 2:47 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Ingo Molnar, (Sat May 3, 2:52 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 3:03 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 3:07 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat May 3, 3:13 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 3:29 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat May 3, 4:22 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat May 3, 4:37 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 5:34 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sat May 3, 5:49 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Sat May 3, 8:54 pm)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun May 4, 12:36 am)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sun May 4, 12:47 am)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Adrian Bunk, (Sun May 4, 12:49 am)
Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sun May 4, 5:18 am)