Re: [PATCH v2] unify sys_pipe implementation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-mips@...>, <sparclinux@...>
Date: Saturday, May 3, 2008 - 2:40 pm

On Sat, 3 May 2008, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

No, definitely not.

That said, I think that in order to not break other architectures, and to 
make it even easier to do this transformation, how about we just mark the 
generic version with __weak?

That way, odd architectures can just continue to call their own versions 
"sys_pipe()", and we don't break them unnecessarily.

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH v2] unify sys_pipe implementation, Ulrich Drepper, (Sat May 3, 2:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] unify sys_pipe implementation, Ralf Baechle, (Mon May 5, 6:18 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] unify sys_pipe implementation, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon May 5, 5:15 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] unify sys_pipe implementation, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 3, 2:40 pm)