Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 9:33 pm

Hi Andrew,

On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:33:01 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>=
 wrote:
rzik/libata-dev.git#NEXT

This just means that everything that Jeff expected to go into 2.6.26 is
not in Linus' tree, right?  And he hasn't moved his 2.6.27 expectations
into linux-next yet (after all we are still in the 2.6.26 merge window).

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 3:12 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 3:20 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 3:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 3:42 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 6:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 6:19 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:34 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Fri May 2, 9:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 9:52 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 9:54 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Sat May 3, 1:46 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun May 4, 5:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Liam Girdwood, (Mon May 5, 9:52 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 10:57 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka Enberg, (Mon May 5, 11:16 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 11:31 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka J Enberg, (Mon May 5, 11:41 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Mon May 5, 12:40 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Daniel Hazelton, (Mon May 5, 2:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 5, 9:41 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 5, 9:43 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 5, 9:45 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 10:50 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:18 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Mon May 12, 11:36 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 12:00 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 3:47 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 5:33 am)