Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 7:02 am

> > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>

Neither I think.  What's going on is that nfsd has a private set of
permission flags, and a private permission checking function, which
incidentally calls the vfs' permission checking function.

Does it hurt to share the three base MAY_ flags for this purpose?  I
don't think it does, but I'm interested in the nfsd maintainers'
opinions.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu May 29, 4:32 am)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu May 29, 5:47 am)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu May 29, 7:02 am)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, J. Bruce Fields, (Thu May 29, 1:40 pm)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri May 30, 12:36 am)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri May 30, 2:07 am)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, Miklos Szeredi, (Fri May 30, 2:53 am)
Re: [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags, J. Bruce Fields, (Fri May 30, 1:12 pm)