On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:58 -0700, David Miller wrote:Having been stopped a couple of times last year when trying to bring some technical subjects for the reason that they were "off topic, KS is for process" I tend to agree :-) There are some things that are hard to get through the list, or even IRC, such as wanting to reorganize some part of the core and wanting to get "live" input and discussion with most arch maintainers. In my case it was some rework on some of the page table batching, for which I finally didn't finish the work as I'm not too happy with what I came up with, but I'm still somewhat convinced there's something to do there and I could use a bit of a group beat-up in a room. There are other areas like that which would benefit from that kind of hard core tech discussion face to face. However, on the other hand, KS is only 2 days, which doesn't leave room for that much stuff. And I don't think splitting into sub-groups or mini-summits is necessarily the answers. There are some areas where it's useful to do the tech beatup -with- everybody in the room. Just my 2 cents... Maybe we need 2 summits, the process one and the tech one ? :-) Cheers, Ben. --
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
