On Wednesday 28 May 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:I think our mistake is the assumption that everyone who wants to contribute to the kernel wants to code, or that everyone wants to end up at the top of the major feature contributors list. For lots of people, we're going to be that experiment from college they never quite want to admit to later on in life. Looking at the KernelProjects link, bugzilla is at the buttom and janitors is at the top. I've always thought the janitors project was important, but maybe we want to change the emphasis around a bit. The regressions page on kernelnewbies is out of date, and there are many more howtos on coding than on bug hunting. It doesn't mention linux-next anywhere. I'm not picking on kernelnewbies, it is one of our best resources. But, going back to James' ideas, introducing people to bug hunting is a better way to involve them in the community. Maintainers are easier to interact with when you send good bug reports along with a clear way to reproduce it and perhaps a bisection Getting all of the above is often 95% of the work of fixing it, people are most likely to jump into the coding when they've found a bad patch and start to wonder if they can fix it themselves. Along those lines, how about a kernel bug hunting challenge. The top contributor(s) to creating bugzillas that get solved get a new pc, laptop, high end graphics card, ssd device...whatever. We could send the best testers hardware that breaks most often...everyone wins. Other prizes could include tickets to a linux conf of choice (not airline tickets, just free entry). One motivation here is to bring bug reporters from active distro communities into testing mainline kernels as well. -chris --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Krzysztof Halasa | [PATCH 0/3] Intel IXP4xx network drivers |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Tony Lindgren | [PATCH 26/90] ARM: OMAP: abstract debug card setup (smc, leds) |
git: | |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial |
| Li Frank-B20596 | why not TortoiseGit |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: Git rescue mission |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Diana Eichert | Re: bcw(4) is gone |
| Chris | OpenBSD 4.4 installation error: write failed; file system full |
| Paul de Weerd | Re: Slow SATA write speeds with SMB |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Ilpo Järvinen | net-next/unix: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible |
| Joakim Tjernlund | raw PF_PACKET protocol selection |
