Re: [PATCH] Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090).

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Willy Tarreau <w@...>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>, Fede <fedux@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 4:14 pm

On Wednesday 2008-05-28 21:56, Willy Tarreau wrote:

Alignment within functions. You could use a JMP to jump over
the alignment, but that would be costly. So in order to
"run through the wall", you need an opcode that does not
do anything, something like 0x90.
0xAF would map to scasd on x86, and I'd hardly call that a
no-op.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Fede, (Tue May 27, 10:01 pm)
[PATCH] Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Hugh Dickins, (Wed May 28, 2:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed May 28, 4:14 pm)
Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed May 28, 12:09 am)