Re: [PATCH] Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090).

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>
Cc: Fede <fedux@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 3:56 pm

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:36:07PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:

Is there a particular reason we use 0x90 as an alignment filler ?
If we can put anything else, at least next time it will not get
confused with NOPs. We could use 0xAF (Alignment Filler) for
instance.

Well done BTW ;-)

Reagrds,
Willy

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Fede, (Tue May 27, 10:01 pm)
[PATCH] Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Hugh Dickins, (Wed May 28, 2:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Willy Tarreau, (Wed May 28, 3:56 pm)
Re: bad pmd ffff810000207238(9090909090909090)., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed May 28, 12:09 am)