On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:36:04PM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 15:44 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Single node GFS2 filesystem. Run fsx. Boom. > > > I've tried it on -nmw and it seems to run ok, and I'm currently running > it on the current upstream kernel and its done 1/2 hour so far with no > sign of a problem. > > Can you give a few more details, such as the block size of the fs whatever the defaults that mkfs used. (unless anaconda did something funky, which is unlikely). [the box is switched off right now, and I'm not near it so I can't check it easily]. > , the > exact command line for fsx (I was just running with defaults) same. just "./fsx foo" > and > perhaps check all the info into a Red Hat bugzilla? I know this is > upstream, but I tend to use "Fedora/rawhide" to keep tabs on such things > just so as all the bugs are in the same place, no problem. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
