On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 13:56 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> in an overnight -tip testruns that is based on recent -git i got two 
> stuck TCP connections:
> 
> Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address               Foreign Address
> State      
> tcp        0 174592 10.0.1.14:58015             10.0.1.14:3632
> ESTABLISHED 
> tcp    72134      0 10.0.1.14:3632              10.0.1.14:58015
> ESTABLISHED 
> 
> on a previously reliable machine. That connection has been stuck for 9 
> hours so it does not time out, etc. - and the distcc run that goes over 
> that connection is stuck as well.
> 
> kernel config is attached.
> 
> in terms of debugging there's not much i can do i'm afraid. It's not 
> possible to get a tcpdump of this incident, given the extreme amount of 
> load these testboxes handle. This problem started sometime around rc3 
> and it occured on two boxes (on a laptop and on a desktop), both are SMP 
> Core2Duo based systems. I never saw this problem before on thousands of 
> similar bootups, so i'm 99.9% sure the bug is either new or became 
> easier to trigger.
> 
> It's not possible to bisect it as it needs up to 12 hours of heavy 
> workload to trigger. The incident happened about 5 times since the first 
> incident a couple of days ago - 4 times on one box and once on another 
> box. The first failing head i became aware of was 78b58e549a3098. (-tip 
> has other changes beyond -git but changes nothing in networking.)
> 
> One clue (which might or might not matter) is that distcc is one of the 
> very few applications that makes use of sendfile().

Just a quick note to say, me too!!

same scenario: distcc on localhost.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/