Re: HAVE_CLK (for <linux/clk.h> support)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 5:01 pm

Hi,

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:14 AM, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

I actually like it. I didn't see this error cuz I was only building
musb for arm architecture.

But why only davinci and omap?
What about: mach-aaec2000, mach-at91, mach-ep93xx, mach-integrator,
mach-lh7a40x, mach-ns9xxx, mach-pnx4008, mach-pxa, mach-realview,
mach-sa1100, mach-versatile, mach-s3c24x.


-- 
Best Regards,

Felipe Balbi
felipebalbi@users.sourceforge.net
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), David Brownell, (Tue May 27, 4:14 pm)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for <linux/clk.h> support), Felipe Balbi, (Tue May 27, 5:01 pm)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), Felipe Balbi, (Tue May 27, 5:05 pm)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), David Brownell, (Tue May 27, 6:41 pm)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), Bryan Wu, (Mon Sep 1, 2:48 am)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), Felipe Balbi, (Mon Sep 1, 3:00 am)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), Bryan Wu, (Mon Sep 1, 3:05 am)
Re: HAVE_CLK (for &lt;linux/clk.h&gt; support), Felipe Balbi, (Mon Sep 1, 3:12 am)