Paul Jackson wrote:
quoted text >
> But I reply mine is better, because we can already provide, with the
> current EFI interfaces, all the entries from the boot loader to the
> kernel, so we do not need to provide them twice, a second time via an
> E820 map mechanism that must be revised and extended to handle the
> additional memory map entries past the first 128 of them.
>
This was discussed over a year ago, and it was declared the boot
loaders' responsibility. Please go back and look at the archives for
the discussion rather than rehashing it at this time.
-hpa
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86 boot: add code to add BIOS provided EF... , H. Peter Anvin , (Tue May 27, 3:16 pm)