login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 2:17 pm

Let's all take a deep breath and relax, ok?  A patch was aggressively
presented and aggressively NAKed.  Let's not get our bowels in an uproar
over it.

Nothing to see here folks, move along...

	-Mike

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 4:58 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 27, 10:22 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 1:53 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 2:17 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue May 27, 7:47 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 9:08 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 27, 1:30 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 3:18 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue May 27, 10:17 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 5:47 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 6:26 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 7:27 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 6:04 am)
speck-geostationary