Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Avi Kivity <avi@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 10:56 am

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:


ok, here comes the next phase of a rather cunning plan: please unify 
these vector allocators first! ;-)

it's nontrivial but would result in rather nice code. I dont know 
whether we want to extend per-CPU vectors to 32-bit as well ... but 
might be worth an attempt and we could give any exploratory patches a 
try in -tip. Eric, what do you think about the general approach?

this would also pave the way towards unified APIC code. Hm?

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon May 26, 6:08 pm)
Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 27, 5:45 am)
Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 27, 10:56 am)
Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 27, 12:24 pm)
Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed May 28, 5:35 am)
Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed May 28, 6:40 am)
Re: Question about interrupt routing and irq allocation, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed May 28, 12:04 pm)