Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 27

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...>, vatsa <vatsa@...>
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 9:08 am

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 01:47:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

Not a single contribution to the kernel above the level of a 
janitor-newbie?

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/676733
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/14/498
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/28/561
...

Awaiting your apology
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 4:58 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 27, 10:22 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 1:53 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 2:17 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue May 27, 7:47 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 9:08 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 27, 1:30 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 3:18 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue May 27, 10:17 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 5:47 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 6:26 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 7:27 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Alan Cox, (Tue May 27, 6:28 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 6:04 am)