On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 11:58 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
NAK - Most if not all issues have fixes or specific reverts already.
Your suggestion is really quite ridiculous and offensive to me. BROKEN
is for stuff that crashes kernels or corrupts user data. Group
scheduling does neither.
As I've said - and which you so 'tactfully' quoted - group scheduling is
a mathmatically complex topic that we are improving actively. The
feature is not enabled by default and it depends on EXPERIMENTAL.
Adrian - if you care about the subject so much - dive into the code and
help us, instead of becoming an obstacle. These past years you've shown
you're capable of understanding trivial C snippets, here is an
opportunity to show you can do real stuff too.
FYI your attitude in the past few weeks is getting on my nerves - you
act all self important but have not made a single contribution to the
kernel above the level of a janitor-newbie.
--
