Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 27

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Mike Galbraith
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 3:04 am

On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 11:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:


Heh, a joking reply was _going_ to be my response, but since I strongly
disagree, I decided to just quote the damn text.. but didn't remove the
joke first :)

Oh well, you mean what I know.

	-Mike

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 1:58 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 2:47 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 3:04 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 3:26 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Alan Cox, (Tue May 27, 3:28 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 4:27 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue May 27, 4:47 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 6:08 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Peter Zijlstra, (Tue May 27, 7:17 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Ingo Molnar, (Tue May 27, 7:22 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue May 27, 10:30 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 10:53 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Mike Galbraith, (Tue May 27, 11:17 am)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue May 27, 12:18 pm)