On Mon, 26 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text > there's a hung distcc task on the system, waiting for socket action
> forever:
>
> [root@europe ~]# strace -fp 19578
> Process 19578 attached - interrupt to quit
> select(5, NULL, [4], [4], {82, 90000} <unfinished ...>
Hmm, readfds is NULL isn't it?!? Are you sure you straced the right
process?
quoted text > disturbing that task via strace did not change the state of the socket -
> and that's not unexpected as it's a select(). [TCP state might be
> affected if strace impacted a recvmsg or a sendmsg wait directly.]
I fail to understand this paragraph due to excessive negation... :-)
--
i.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ , Ilpo Järvinen , (Mon May 26, 7:58 am)