login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
25
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Alan Cox <alan@...>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Glauber Costa <gcosta@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <andi-suse@...>
Subject:
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
Date: Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 3:55 pm
On Sun, 25 May 2008 18:35:39 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
quoted text
> > So how about linux-2.6.26-gfp-no-oom.patch (see previous mail) for > > 2.6.26 > > Changing the gfp once globally like you did is not right, because > the different fallback cases have to be handled differently > (see the different cases I discussed in my earlier mail) > > Especially the 16MB zone allocation should never trigger the OOM killer.
That depends how much memory you have. Alan --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Miquel van Smoorenburg
, (Wed May 21, 7:30 am)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Glauber Costa
, (Wed May 21, 8:49 am)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Andi Kleen
, (Thu May 22, 4:47 am)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Thu May 22, 3:58 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Andi Kleen
, (Thu May 22, 6:59 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Miquel van Smoorenburg
, (Thu May 22, 3:25 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Miquel van Smoorenburg
, (Sat May 24, 3:38 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Andi Kleen
, (Sun May 25, 12:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Alan Cox
, (Sun May 25, 3:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Andi Kleen
, (Sun May 25, 5:23 pm)
Re: 2.6.26: x86/kernel/pci_dma.c: gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY ?
, Alan Cox
, (Sun May 25, 6:02 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg KH
[2.6.22.2 review 05/84] Fix deadlocks in sparc serial console.
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Andrew Morton
-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jeff Kirsher
[RESEND][NET-NEXT PATCH 01/29] ixgbe: fix bug where using wake queue instead of st...
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Patrick McHardy
Re: [GIT]: Networking
netbsd-tech-kern
:
Manuel Bouyer
Re: Interactive performance in -current
Christian Limpach
Re: newfs: determining file system parameters
YAMAMOTO Takashi
Re: statvfs(2) replacement for statfs(2) patch
Charles M. Hannum
Re: kern/22869: Slave IDE drive not detected
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
1040 guests
online.
Online users
plasmavslcd
Syndicate