Hi Michael,the reason is pretty simple; the a kernel driver should not do any kind of policy, namespace or whatever you wanna call it. This should be done in userspace. And some operating system really suffer from this ABI guarantee. I am not getting into this since it has been discussed so many times and the kernel source contains full documentation why we are not doing it. We actually do and we the future remove document and the requirements document within the kernel source this is fully documented all of the time. However you have to understand that at some point we have to make sure that kernel and userspace are recent. But again, this will be all documented and if a distro than decides to bluntly ignore it, then go ahead an blame the distro. The kernel depends on the "plumbing" and vise versa. Regards Marcel --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
